Well, what a
performance! Upon visiting the Richmond Theatre to see the penultimate showing of My Cousin Rachel, I went into this production with an attitude akin to someone
paying a house-call on a familiar friend – the storyline of this tale being
well known to me, having read the novel, and subsequently having seen the 1952
and 2017 movie adaptations.
Before the drama
began, I tried to converse with a fellow theatre-goer about Daphne du Maurier’s
tale, although all I managed to establish from her was a preference for Rebecca.
To be honest, I don’t think she understood my questions, so rather self-consciously
I returned to my thoughts.
I was seated up in
the heavens (the Upper Circle), which gave a surprisingly decent view of the
stage. The players, when they appeared, were not as tiny as I had feared!
So, on to the play.
There was the expected opening line, “They used to hang men at Four Turnings”,
but then the time jumped forwards suddenly, to after the moment of Ambrose’s
death. It was interesting (and unique) to have the whole backstory of Ambrose,
and Philip’s subsequent visit to Italy following his death, happen ‘off stage’
so to speak, but with hindsight this approach made sense, considering that the
main backdrop on stage was that of the Ashleys’ living room (or whatever the
correct term would be), with table, fireplace and portrait of the late Ambrose.
Another unique element
to this production, for me, was provision of a backstory to two particular
characters (omitted, as I recall, from the film adaptations, though I may be
wrong). First of these was Louise, dear and loyal, a friend to Philip
throughout. We learn a bit about her childhood, and there comes later on in the
play, an amusing discourse about how she has a “bewildering vocabulary of curse
words”! The second character to be given some background was the servant boy,
Tom, who suffered a limp following an accident in the factory where he used to
work. I don’t recall him being mentioned in much depth, if at all, in previous
adaptations. As far as I was aware, Secombe was the only servant.
As with all theatre
productions, I love how the lighting and scenery are used to maximum effect to
create illusion and movement. This production was no exception. I loved the
creation of the firelight glow, the sudden scene changes, and the background
rainfall. I’m still wondering, in fact, how the candlelight was created, and
how the fire swelled just for an instant when a letter was thrown upon it to be
burned.
The acting was
admirable, in my opinion, and grew on me as the play continued. At first I was
inclined to think that Rachel’s accent was too English (vis a vis Call the
Midwife, which given the actress, would have been understandable). However,
as time progressed, we were treated to little hints of Italian here and there,
better enforcing the feeling that this lady was indeed a foreigner to Cornwall.
The Italian (accurate or not, I could not tell) came to the fore in the scene with
Rachel and Señor Rinaldi, on which Philip intrudes. I agree with Nick Kendall,
when he remarks that “Italian is so noisy” (although in a different context, referring
rather to Rachel’s prospects as a language teacher, had not Philip generously –
perhaps ill-advisedly – intervened).
There was plenty of
humour too, with quotes such as “A flash of ankle, and you behave like chimpanzees”
(Rachel, on the attitude of men towards beautiful women), and Philip’s response
when Secombe remarks on the good it does a person to see a lady of a morning: “Then
put on a frock and look in the mirror!” Secombe, specifically alluding to
Rachel, says “The moon can send ladies far out of their minds – though they don’t
have far to go.”
As you are probably aware, the drama takes
place in part over Christmas time, and so it was with a sense of unexpected
gladness that I was treated to a tuneful rendition of ‘In the Bleak Midwinter’,
with harmonies – although alas, Rachel was unable to reach one of the high
notes, which was particularly noticeable. I wonder, did Louise really play the
piano? If so, bravo!
The
rotating stage was used effectively throughout the production, but particularly
at the high point of Philip’s birthday eve, as he announces his intent to wed
Rachel (to a rather colder reception than he would have liked). This was
balanced against the light-hearted scene of receiving the birthday presents – a
model of himself, from Tom, and a drawing of Secombe, from Secombe – surely put
in for light relief.
The
climax of the play seemed rather abridged, in my opinion, with a hasty account
of Philip’s feverishness and paranoia (much extended in both book and films). There
was also no scene with Miss Pascoe coming to stay (although a female companion
is requested by Rachel). As Rachel leaves for her walk, no Laburnum seeds were
found, in this version, upon Philip’s searching of her belongings (a trunk,
rather than her room), and so her ultimate guilt over Ambrose’s death is again
left in doubt. Alas, Philip’s efforts to save Rachel from her fate are moments
too late, and rather poignantly he repeats the opening lines “They used to hang
men at Four Turnings”, this time obviously alluding to himself, as he cradles
Rachel’s lifeless form – this, a take I’d never seen done before, but
strikingly effective.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.